<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A rejoinder to the alternative SafeHashMap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/02/a-rejoinder-to-the-alternative-safehashmap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/02/a-rejoinder-to-the-alternative-safehashmap/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-rejoinder-to-the-alternative-safehashmap</link>
	<description>Dhananjay Nene's opinions on software programming, design, architecture and the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Kuleshov</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/02/a-rejoinder-to-the-alternative-safehashmap/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Kuleshov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/archives/21#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I answered to your points in comments to my blog post.

In regards to static import, the great new is that you don&#039;t have to use them. However it is considered useful pattern in many cases. For example, you may want to look at the Doug Lea&#039;s new fork/join framework, which provides huge number of the common static factories and which will be part of the Java 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I answered to your points in comments to my blog post.</p>
<p>In regards to static import, the great new is that you don&#8217;t have to use them. However it is considered useful pattern in many cases. For example, you may want to look at the Doug Lea&#8217;s new fork/join framework, which provides huge number of the common static factories and which will be part of the Java 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Kuleshov</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/02/a-rejoinder-to-the-alternative-safehashmap/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Kuleshov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/archives/21#comment-455</guid>
		<description>I answered to your points in comments to my blog post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In regards to static import, the great new is that you don&#039;t have to use them. However it is considered useful pattern in many cases. For example, you may want to look at the Doug Lea&#039;s new fork/join framework, which provides huge number of the common static factories and which will be part of the Java 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I answered to your points in comments to my blog post.</p>
<p>In regards to static import, the great new is that you don&#39;t have to use them. However it is considered useful pattern in many cases. For example, you may want to look at the Doug Lea&#39;s new fork/join framework, which provides huge number of the common static factories and which will be part of the Java 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 3.838 seconds -->

