<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My first impressions of Google Knol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/my-first-impressions-of-google-knol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/my-first-impressions-of-google-knol/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=my-first-impressions-of-google-knol</link>
	<description>Dhananjay Nene's opinions on software programming, design, architecture and the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/my-first-impressions-of-google-knol/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>PD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=40#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Dhananjay, few things. 

- The reason Knol is called as authoritative because others can rate and comment on articles, which is not possible with Wikis. 
- Knol has content about almost everything, try searching for it. Most of it is imported from Wikipedia though.
- The license for the content is Creative Commons, which means content is owned by author and cannot be used for commercial purposes. This is same as Wikipedia.
- Unlike Wikipedia, Knol tries to put in some well formed structure around the content. It essentially tries to incorporate all the essential elements we use while publishing a paper.
- Ability to have multiple articles on same topic is a very good feature as against Wikipedia. This was one very big drawback with Wikipedia, you could either edit existing article or have to pick article name so that it doesn&#039;t coincide with existing article. This is very essential feature for lot of controversial topics.

Knol is a competition for Wikipedia and not for Wikis in general so I don&#039;t see any usecase for enterprises internal use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dhananjay, few things. </p>
<p>- The reason Knol is called as authoritative because others can rate and comment on articles, which is not possible with Wikis.<br />
- Knol has content about almost everything, try searching for it. Most of it is imported from Wikipedia though.<br />
- The license for the content is Creative Commons, which means content is owned by author and cannot be used for commercial purposes. This is same as Wikipedia.<br />
- Unlike Wikipedia, Knol tries to put in some well formed structure around the content. It essentially tries to incorporate all the essential elements we use while publishing a paper.<br />
- Ability to have multiple articles on same topic is a very good feature as against Wikipedia. This was one very big drawback with Wikipedia, you could either edit existing article or have to pick article name so that it doesn&#8217;t coincide with existing article. This is very essential feature for lot of controversial topics.</p>
<p>Knol is a competition for Wikipedia and not for Wikis in general so I don&#8217;t see any usecase for enterprises internal use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PD</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/my-first-impressions-of-google-knol/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>PD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=40#comment-454</guid>
		<description>Dhananjay, few things. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- The reason Knol is called as authoritative because others can rate and comment on articles, which is not possible with Wikis. &lt;br&gt;- Knol has content about almost everything, try searching for it. Most of it is imported from Wikipedia though.&lt;br&gt;- The license for the content is Creative Commons, which means content is owned by author and cannot be used for commercial purposes. This is same as Wikipedia.&lt;br&gt;- Unlike Wikipedia, Knol tries to put in some well formed structure around the content. It essentially tries to incorporate all the essential elements we use while publishing a paper.&lt;br&gt;- Ability to have multiple articles on same topic is a very good feature as against Wikipedia. This was one very big drawback with Wikipedia, you could either edit existing article or have to pick article name so that it doesn&#039;t coincide with existing article. This is very essential feature for lot of controversial topics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Knol is a competition for Wikipedia and not for Wikis in general so I don&#039;t see any usecase for enterprises internal use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dhananjay, few things. </p>
<p>- The reason Knol is called as authoritative because others can rate and comment on articles, which is not possible with Wikis. <br />- Knol has content about almost everything, try searching for it. Most of it is imported from Wikipedia though.<br />- The license for the content is Creative Commons, which means content is owned by author and cannot be used for commercial purposes. This is same as Wikipedia.<br />- Unlike Wikipedia, Knol tries to put in some well formed structure around the content. It essentially tries to incorporate all the essential elements we use while publishing a paper.<br />- Ability to have multiple articles on same topic is a very good feature as against Wikipedia. This was one very big drawback with Wikipedia, you could either edit existing article or have to pick article name so that it doesn&#39;t coincide with existing article. This is very essential feature for lot of controversial topics.</p>
<p>Knol is a competition for Wikipedia and not for Wikis in general so I don&#39;t see any usecase for enterprises internal use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DE</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/my-first-impressions-of-google-knol/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=40#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Yes, but who owns your articles - you or google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but who owns your articles &#8211; you or google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DE</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/my-first-impressions-of-google-knol/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=40#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Yes, but who owns your articles - you or google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but who owns your articles &#8211; you or google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veera</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/my-first-impressions-of-google-knol/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Veera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=40#comment-332</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used TeamWiki (a wiki based CMS) internally and I felt it is good. My opinion is also same as you that Wiki is enough for enterprises. 

But, Knol may have an edge over wiki because of Google&#039; search power!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used TeamWiki (a wiki based CMS) internally and I felt it is good. My opinion is also same as you that Wiki is enough for enterprises. </p>
<p>But, Knol may have an edge over wiki because of Google&#8217; search power!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.380 seconds -->

