<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Wifi routers be required to mandate strong authentication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/09/should-wifi-routers-be-required-to-mandate-strong-authentication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/09/should-wifi-routers-be-required-to-mandate-strong-authentication/</link>
	<description>Dhananjay Nene's opinions on software programming, design, architecture and the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:58:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Knowledge Worker</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/09/should-wifi-routers-be-required-to-mandate-strong-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Knowledge Worker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=64#comment-506</guid>
		<description>&quot;Some security&quot; or &quot;No Security at all&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would root with &quot;Some Security&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Some security&#8221; or &#8220;No Security at all&#8221;</p>
<p>I would root with &#8220;Some Security&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How can a ISP not be up to date on security ?</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/09/should-wifi-routers-be-required-to-mandate-strong-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>How can a ISP not be up to date on security ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=64#comment-488</guid>
		<description>[...] few days back I blogged about wireless security becoming a prominent issue in India. In that I had essentially defended the ISPs given the fact that they could not be expected to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few days back I blogged about wireless security becoming a prominent issue in India. In that I had essentially defended the ISPs given the fact that they could not be expected to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/09/should-wifi-routers-be-required-to-mandate-strong-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 05:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=64#comment-477</guid>
		<description>A lot of families would probably want to have a nice easy setup before they secure their access points.  Many people, including myself, tend to get very frustrated when they have to configure things.  We like things to &quot;just work&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, some manufacturers have incorporated simple ways to set up secure networks.  Ever tried using the &quot;Secure Easy Setup&quot; on Linksys routers?  Of course, that happens to be specific to Linksys -- you need their access points + software on other PCs to make it &quot;easy&quot;.  Most other routers have a Web interface where you can set up WPA with a key.  It&#039;s simple enough if you have basic computing skill and some luck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like the idea of denying Internet-based routing: have a Web-based prompt pop up when the user tries to access a Web site.  Once a password is established, you could at least allow only that MAC address to contact the router -- which could stop a lot of hackers.  The only reason why it doesn&#039;t already exist is ease-of-use, and the fact that this sector of the world is supposedly very computer literate and could set it up themselves anyway.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are a lot of other positive benefits to automatically configured or mandatory security -- like getting rid of bandwidth-hogging free riders.  Here in the university dorms, where there&#039;s only wired ethernet, setting up an unsecured access point is a bad idea.  The poor souls who don&#039;t encrypt discover their connections slow down to a standstill within days, as most students have laptops which automatically connect.  Instead of learning the hard way, students could secure their routers in the first place...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of families would probably want to have a nice easy setup before they secure their access points.  Many people, including myself, tend to get very frustrated when they have to configure things.  We like things to &#8220;just work&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, some manufacturers have incorporated simple ways to set up secure networks.  Ever tried using the &#8220;Secure Easy Setup&#8221; on Linksys routers?  Of course, that happens to be specific to Linksys &#8212; you need their access points + software on other PCs to make it &#8220;easy&#8221;.  Most other routers have a Web interface where you can set up WPA with a key.  It&#39;s simple enough if you have basic computing skill and some luck.</p>
<p>I like the idea of denying Internet-based routing: have a Web-based prompt pop up when the user tries to access a Web site.  Once a password is established, you could at least allow only that MAC address to contact the router &#8212; which could stop a lot of hackers.  The only reason why it doesn&#39;t already exist is ease-of-use, and the fact that this sector of the world is supposedly very computer literate and could set it up themselves anyway.</p>
<p>There are a lot of other positive benefits to automatically configured or mandatory security &#8212; like getting rid of bandwidth-hogging free riders.  Here in the university dorms, where there&#39;s only wired ethernet, setting up an unsecured access point is a bad idea.  The poor souls who don&#39;t encrypt discover their connections slow down to a standstill within days, as most students have laptops which automatically connect.  Instead of learning the hard way, students could secure their routers in the first place&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.692 seconds -->
