<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is statelessness in REST ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/04/what-is-statelessness-in-rest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/04/what-is-statelessness-in-rest/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-statelessness-in-rest</link>
	<description>Dhananjay Nene's opinions on software programming, design, architecture and the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chintan Zaveri</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/04/what-is-statelessness-in-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-6077</link>
		<dc:creator>Chintan Zaveri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=622#comment-6077</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your reply, Dhananjay! Makes a lot of sense. Completely agree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply, Dhananjay! Makes a lot of sense. Completely agree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhananjay Nene</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/04/what-is-statelessness-in-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-6067</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhananjay Nene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=622#comment-6067</guid>
		<description>@Chintan, 
Semantics allows clear and concise communication of ideas. A great example is the GOF Patterns where the authors very clearly defined what each pattern meant so that we can talk to each other and say &quot;Visitor Pattern&quot; and convey quite unambiguously something that would&#039;ve taken paragraphs or pages. 

My concern is when semantics are inconsistent, it leads to lot of confusion and abuse. Which is why at least, I would prefer that we collectively stick to the semantic notions clearly. This is also a thread I explored in &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/01/software-it-terms-in-early-stages-of-abuse-or-ripe-for-abuse/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Software / IT Terms in early stages of abuse or ripe for Abuse&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chintan,<br />
Semantics allows clear and concise communication of ideas. A great example is the GOF Patterns where the authors very clearly defined what each pattern meant so that we can talk to each other and say &#8220;Visitor Pattern&#8221; and convey quite unambiguously something that would&#8217;ve taken paragraphs or pages. </p>
<p>My concern is when semantics are inconsistent, it leads to lot of confusion and abuse. Which is why at least, I would prefer that we collectively stick to the semantic notions clearly. This is also a thread I explored in <a href="http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/01/software-it-terms-in-early-stages-of-abuse-or-ripe-for-abuse/" rel="nofollow">Software / IT Terms in early stages of abuse or ripe for Abuse</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chintan Zaveri</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/04/what-is-statelessness-in-rest/comment-page-1/#comment-6055</link>
		<dc:creator>Chintan Zaveri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=622#comment-6055</guid>
		<description>Good post! With all due respect, isn&#039;t this just a matter of name. I mean, we call it Ajax regardless of whether we use XML or JSON or regardless of those occasional synchronous calls? Can&#039;t say, Ajax is a misnomer. FWIW, REST is a great technology to use for many situations. 

Please correct me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post! With all due respect, isn&#8217;t this just a matter of name. I mean, we call it Ajax regardless of whether we use XML or JSON or regardless of those occasional synchronous calls? Can&#8217;t say, Ajax is a misnomer. FWIW, REST is a great technology to use for many situations. </p>
<p>Please correct me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.375 seconds -->

