<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mind your language: Pragmatic programmers should not be re-termed duct tape programmers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/09/mind-your-language-pragmatic-programmers-should-not-be-re-termed-duct-tape-programmers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/09/mind-your-language-pragmatic-programmers-should-not-be-re-termed-duct-tape-programmers/</link>
	<description>Dhananjay Nene's opinions on software programming, design, architecture and the internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 05:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: All About the Duct-Tape Programmer &#124; Thought Clusters</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/09/mind-your-language-pragmatic-programmers-should-not-be-re-termed-duct-tape-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-9163</link>
		<dc:creator>All About the Duct-Tape Programmer &#124; Thought Clusters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=825#comment-9163</guid>
		<description>[...] Dhananjay Nene [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dhananjay Nene [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manoj Phatak</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/09/mind-your-language-pragmatic-programmers-should-not-be-re-termed-duct-tape-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-9155</link>
		<dc:creator>Manoj Phatak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=825#comment-9155</guid>
		<description>I completely agree. I think this is the most concise reply on Joel&#039;s this post.

Terminology matters a lot. Its a shared vocabulary. Moment we just call a term; it pulls all the baggage with it. This makes life very easy; but at the same time prone to confusion if used incorrectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. I think this is the most concise reply on Joel&#8217;s this post.</p>
<p>Terminology matters a lot. Its a shared vocabulary. Moment we just call a term; it pulls all the baggage with it. This makes life very easy; but at the same time prone to confusion if used incorrectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2009/09/mind-your-language-pragmatic-programmers-should-not-be-re-termed-duct-tape-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-9154</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dhananjaynene.com/?p=825#comment-9154</guid>
		<description>I completely agree. I understand the point he was conveying but he probably could have done it without references to the term duct tape programmers. There&#039;s a big difference between a pragmatic programmer who can drastically shorten a development cycle by keeping things simple and maintainable and a true &quot;duct tape programmer&quot; who quickly assembles an unmaintainable, and typically buggy solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. I understand the point he was conveying but he probably could have done it without references to the term duct tape programmers. There&#8217;s a big difference between a pragmatic programmer who can drastically shorten a development cycle by keeping things simple and maintainable and a true &#8220;duct tape programmer&#8221; who quickly assembles an unmaintainable, and typically buggy solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.372 seconds -->
